Offenders Allowed In Schools

Tools

South Dakota's laws involving sex offenders and safety zones are meant to keep offenders away from schools, parks and pools.

South Dakota's laws involving sex offenders and safety zones are meant to keep offenders away from schools, parks and pools.

By Brian Allen

A Canistota mom contacted us, wanting to know why a convicted sex offender was allowed inside the public school to get his son's homework.

She was under the impression state law kept sex offenders away from schools, parks and pools.

It does, but as we found out, only to a point.

Under current rules, convicted sex offenders are supposed to stay 500 feet away from schools, parks and pools.

But the way South Dakota law reads, offenders can freely visit those areas if they have a valid reason.

In Canistota, Darin Nugteren...convicted three months ago of sexual contact with a 15 year old girl.. entered the public school last week to pick up his sick son's books from his locker.

We checked with the state attorney generals office and found, under state law, it's a valid reason. No law was broken.

Also, if a sex offender wants to go jogging and runs through a park where kids are playing, it's allowed under state law.

But, if an offender is in a safety zone area and is found loitering, that's where state law kicks in and the offender could find themselves in trouble.

We're going to stay on this story to find out if South Dakota lawmakers think rules for sex offenders should be tightened up or stay the way they are now.

View comments

The following comments do not necessarily represent the views of KSFY.com. Users have agreed to these terms and in doing so accept full responsibility for their comments. Moderation is limited.

Thursday, Feb 19 at 3:45 PM TrevorBelmont wrote ...

Residency restrictions don't work at all and should be abolished. And anti-loitering laws are tolerable but not when the laws become abused. Some people are in serious need of facts. Not every SO is a slobbering child hungry pedo. Most will never re-offend. Oh, and most sex crimes are committed by people not on the registry. Statistically speaking, most sex crimes are committed by loved ones, very rarely by strangers. Lots of facts at www.oncefallen.com

Thursday, Feb 19 at 9:20 AM SaS wrote ...

The very laws that we think are protecting our children are not. They need to be stepped up to the next level. Child molesters should NEVER be allowed around children again. Period. www.safeatschools.com

Wednesday, Feb 18 at 10:40 PM Brenda wrote ...

I feel that when people are required to be registered sex offenders, there should be "levels" of offenders based upon the offense & the risk of re-offending. These levels could indicate what the court feels is the risk to the general public. Mybe this person is not considered a high risk. Without knowing the whole story, it should not be assumed that this man is dangerous for going in to the school and picking up his sick child's homework!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

KSFY.com and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

I have read and agree to the terms

Hide comments

YouNews

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand

Stock Quotes

Flash Poll

Do you agree with the new recommendation that women should wait until they are 21 to get their first pap smear test?

  • Yes
  • No

AP Video