Mixed Reaction To Smoking Ban Vote

Tools

By Chuck Harmer

The South Dakota smoking ban will not take effect as scheduled next week because a coalition handed in enough signatures to put the measure to a statewide public vote in next year's november election.

The petition needed nearly 17,000 signatures to put the measure to a public vote and today the Secretary of State's office says they have over 18,000.

Today, supporters of the smoking ban say they have enough signatures and there is mixed reaction to the news.

Vicki Bruse is a non-smoker who is for the smoking ban but has a daughter who loves her job at the bar and makes a good living doing it but the potential health risks of working in a smoke filled is on both of their minds.

"It's one reason where she knows she has to get into something else because of that. But if it goes smoke free she could enjoy doing what she loves," said Vicki Bruse.

Her daughter Erin manages Nutty's South and the ban has certainly been a topic of conversation this year. But with a slow economy, Erin says that now is not the best time to deter any customers. Erin says, "as of right now I think it is a good thing that it did not pass just for our business. We have so much competition going on around us and because of the economy we can't afford to have people not coming in here just because of the smoking ban."

Would mom come in more if the ban would have gone into affect on the first of July? "I think we would go out once in a while but the first thing I think about is a smoke filled bar. I just can't even come in a bar, I just don't want to do it," answered Vicki.

Now supporters of the ban say they will attempt to further verify whether enough valid petition signatures have been filed.

Today, supporters of the smoking ban say they have enough signatures and there is mixed reaction to the news.

Vicki Bruse is a non-smoker who is for the smoking ban but has a daughter who loves her job at the bar and makes a good living doing it but the potential health risks of working in a smoke filled is on both of their minds.

"It's one reason where she knows she has to get into something else because of that. But if it goes smoke free she could enjoy doing what she loves," said Vicki Bruse.

Her daughter Erin manages Nutty's South and the ban has certainly been a topic of conversation this year. But with a slow economy, Erin says that now is not the best time to deter any customers. Erin says, "as of right now I think it is a good thing that it did not pass just for our business. We have so much competition going on around us and because of the economy we can't afford to have people not coming in here just because of the smoking ban."

Would mom come in more if the ban would have gone into affect on the first of July? "I think we would go out once in a while but the first thing I think about is a smoke filled bar. I just can't even come in a bar, I just don't want to do it," answered Vicki.

Now supporters of the ban say they will attempt to further verify whether enough valid petition signatures have been filed.

View comments

The following comments do not necessarily represent the views of KSFY.com. Users have agreed to these terms and in doing so accept full responsibility for their comments. Moderation is limited.

Friday, Jun 26 at 5:49 PM james dono wrote ...

Their are alternatives such and ecigs and vaporizers. http://vaporizers.intodit.com/ plus wikipedia has some good links also..

Friday, Jun 26 at 9:13 AM Bob wrote ...

Be careful of the wording. They lied to Ohio voters by promising some exemptions on the ballot, only to have them removed after they voted. Three years later, the people of Ohio are still trying to get the ban amended as it was worded on the ballot.

Friday, Jun 26 at 7:27 AM Smoker wrote ...

I didn't start smoking until my 20s, but the issue is the non-smoking, that should be left up to the bar owners, we have enough interference on how thing are already by creating new laws every year. It is a personal business, if they want it smoke free or not, it should be left up to the individual bar owners/business' not the government. People have a choice to enter any business, if they don't like it because it's not smoke free, they can shop or drink elsewhere.

Friday, Jun 26 at 6:16 AM Pete and REpeat wrote ...

Half of this article is repeated at the end. Ever hear of proof reading?

Friday, Jun 26 at 6:14 AM ANon wrote ...

As another bar employee, i would like to know how many bars closed in MN and NE? and what is the lost revenue? The mom said if it had gone into affect would sho go out more "I think we would go out once in awhile" How much revenue is that? The bar I work at has non smoking customers and smoking customers. As one of the non smokers said..."place a sign on the door that says this is a smoking place if they don't like it they don't have to come in" enough said-- let people choos

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

KSFY.com and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

I have read and agree to the terms

Hide comments

YouNews

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand

Stock Quotes

Flash Poll

Do you agree with the new recommendation that women should wait until they are 21 to get their first pap smear test?

  • Yes
  • No

AP Video