Smoking Ban Supporters Say 10,000 Signatures Invalid

Tools

Smoking Ban Supporters Say 10,000 Signatures Invalid

By KSFY Staff

Supporters of the state wide smoking ban are challenging the validity of signatures on a petition that would bring the state wide smoking ban to a public vote on a November 2010 ballot.

The state wide ban was supposed to go into effect this week - until the signatures were filed on a petition. Now the ban to keep smoking out of bars might not go to a public vote after all.

The American Heart Association is crying foul over nearly 10,000 signatures gathered to put the issue on the ballot.

Darrin Smith with the American Heart Association said, "They do not have the minimum number of legitimate valid signatures to qualify for the ballot and that is precisely that challenge that we're using today."

But one of the people who helped get the issue to a public vote believes the signatures will stand.

Larry Mann of Video Lottery Establishments of South Dakota said, "I feel confident that the law, the statute that the secretary uses to validate those signatures was complied with."

But Darin Smith disagrees and says the discrepancies are big enough to overturn the petition right now.

"The most common reason for the nearly 10,000 invalid signatures were very simply, several thousand people who signed the petition sheets were not registered voters," he said.

Larry Mann counters, "Politics is a strange thing and I can't imagine this would be overturned, but if it is, we'll have to discuss it at that time."

Meanwhile smokers who stop at bars across the stae for a drink or dinner are still free to light up.

But if the Secretary of State agrees that enough signatures are invalid, South Dakota's smoking ban could go into effect immediately.

© 2009 KSFY Action News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

View comments

The following comments do not necessarily represent the views of KSFY.com. Users have agreed to these terms and in doing so accept full responsibility for their comments. Moderation is limited.

Saturday, Jul 4 at 6:56 AM Anonymous wrote ...

Why would someone who is NOT a registered voter sign the petition anyway? I'm sure they were told they have to be a reigistered voter. Either the people going around looking for signatures weren't doing their job honestly or the people signing weren't honest. Either way, shows pro smokers aren't that bright in all aspects.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

KSFY.com and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

I have read and agree to the terms

Hide comments

YouNews

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand

Stock Quotes

Flash Poll

Do you agree with the new recommendation that women should wait until they are 21 to get their first pap smear test?

  • Yes
  • No

AP Video