South Dakota Supreme Court denies Berget's petition - KSFY News - Sioux Falls, SD News, Weather, Sports

South Dakota Supreme Court denies Berget's petition for rehearing

Posted: Updated:

 PIERRE, S.D.- Attorney General Marty Jackley announced today that the South Dakota Supreme Court has issued an order denying Rodney Scott Berget's Petition requesting a new Supreme Court hearing in relation to the murder of Senior Correctional Officer Ronald " RJ" Johnson. On January 22, 2013, Berget filed a petition for an additional hearing before the Supreme Court. Berget sought a rehearing before the Supreme Court claiming that the South Dakota Supreme Court had misunderstood the law as it pertained to his case.

"At trial the State presented substantial aggravating evidence demonstrating ‘the heinousness of the crime as well as Berget's extensive criminal history, hopeless chance of rehabilitation, and multiple attempts of escape'," said Jackley. "The Supreme Court has issued a thorough and well-reasoned opinion affirming that the overwhelming majority of the evidence was appropriately considered. The single remaining issue surrounding the psychological evaluation may now be ‘conducted on the existing record'."

On January 3, 2013, the South Dakota Supreme Court issued its Appellate decision that affirmed the following major case issues:

1. The sentence of death was not imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor.

2. The evidence supports the judge's finding of aggravating circumstances as enumerated in SDCL 23A-27A-1.

3. The sentence of death was not excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in other death penalty cases, or as respects co-defendant Eric Donald Robert, considering Berget's crime and his character.

4. That Berget knowingly and intelligently waived his right to a sentencing jury.

5. The death sentence was based on appropriate record evidence.

6. Berget received an individualized sentencing determination.

7. The trial court properly considered evidence of Berget's criminal history.

8. Admission of evidence regarding Berget's criminal history was reliable and relevant to the court's consideration of Berget's character under SDCL 23A-27A-2(3).

9. The circuit court allowed proper victim impact evidence to be admitted at the pre-sentence hearing

Powered by WorldNow
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 WorldNow and KSFY. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service or our EEO Report.